0
Hebrew doesn't have numerals. The Ancients used letters of the alphabet to represent numbers. Modern Jews still use this method for religious purposes.
3 answers
For the Hebrew numerals from 1 to 100, click here.
1 answer
Hebrew has no numerals, like 1, 2 and 3. Instead, Hebrew uses letters which would mean numerals, based on the context. So there are many "words" that look just like certain numbers.
For example, the letters that spell the Hebrew word "chaim" also mean the number "18". The Hebrew word "chaim" means "life", so many people interpret the number "18" as meaning "life".
1 answer
In English, Roman Numerals are used to list the Ten Commandments because it looks old and fancy. In other languages, like Hebrew, the Ten Commandments are listed using alphabetical numerals (א ב ג ד).
1 answer
Modern Hebrew uses the same numbers everyone else uses. There is no difference except in pronunciation.
In ancient times, the letters of the alphabet were used as numbers. This practice is still done today for Jewish numbers, such as chapters and verses of the Bible and for Dates on the Jewish calendar.
If you want more information about Hebrew numbers, click this link: Hebrew Numerals
1 answer
Aramaic has no word for zero, since that value does not occur in the Aramaic numeral system, nor in Roman numerals or in ancient Hebrew or in ancient Egyptian.
1 answer
Hebrew uses the same numberals as English, so it would be 1986.
For trad×™tional Jewish number, you can use letters of the Hebrew alphabet, but you usually don't use these numbers for anything larger than 400, because it becomes cumbersome. Even the Hebrew year is only written in abbreviated form.
1986 would be: תתתתשפ״ז
1 answer
Your Apple ID password can only be made with roman letters. The iPad pass code is always Arabic numerals. Maybe it's a conspiracy.
1 answer
A very important translation of the Old Testament ('Hebrew Scriptures / Hebrew Bible') into Greek was the Septuaginttranslation.
'LXX' (Roman numerals for '70') is an abbreviation for this translation.
There are also other translations of the Hebrew scriptures into Greek, but the LXX is the oldest, and is very highly regarded.
For more information, see Related links below.
1 answer
The numerals that most Americans use are the Indian numerals or the Arabian numerals
1 answer
Roman numerals were inspired by Etruscan numerals of which Roman numerals originated from.
1 answer
It depends on what kind of numerals you are talking about:
In Arabic numerals, it is 1000.
In Roman numerals, it is M.
1 answer
'Numerals???' Are we talking of Roman Numerals.
In which case 23 = XXIII
2 answers
There are many but roman numerals refer tohindu arrabic numerals
1 answer
dcccxiii in Roman numerals is equivalent to 813 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
1 answer
The Roman numerals of XXVIII are the equivalent of 28 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
1 answer
Those are Roman numerals. In Arabic numerals it is 1697.
1 answer
It is already in numerals but if you mean in Roman numerals then its equivalent is MDCCII
1 answer
Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.
Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.
Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.
Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.
Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.
Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.
Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.
Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.
Eleven in Roman numerals is XI.
4 answers
Arabic numerals are called that because the European interpretation of those numbers comes from the Arabs. The numerals are called Arabic numerals (even though they do not resemble modern Arabic numerals in the slightest) to distinguish them from Roman numerals.
1 answer
LXVIII is already in Roman numerals. In Arabic numerals, it is 68.
1 answer
The Roman numerals MMM is equivalent to 3000 in Arabic numerals.
1 answer
It is already expressed in numerals as 611 but if you mean in Roman numerals then it is DCXI
1 answer
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore there is no equivalent of them in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
1 answer
Indian numerals came to be called Hindu- Arabic numerals for many reasons. Some of those reasons are because they were originated from India where they were using the numerals for 1 to 9 for more than 2,000 years. Arab traders then brought these numerals to the West, As a result, we call them Arabic numerals, or Hindu-Arabic numerals.
1 answer
Indian numerals came to be called Hindu- Arabic numerals for many reasons. Some of those reasons are because they were originated from India where they were using the numerals for 1 to 9 for more than 2,000 years. Arab traders then brought these numerals to the West, As a result, we call them Arabic numerals, or Hindu-Arabic numerals.
1 answer
The Roma numerals for 354 would be CCCLIV.
The Roma numerals for 354 would be CCCLIV.
The Roma numerals for 354 would be CCCLIV.
The Roma numerals for 354 would be CCCLIV.
The Roma numerals for 354 would be CCCLIV.
The Roma numerals for 354 would be CCCLIV.
The Roma numerals for 354 would be CCCLIV.
The Roma numerals for 354 would be CCCLIV.
The Roma numerals for 354 would be CCCLIV.
2 answers
The Roman numerals LXVII=67 in Hindu Arabic numerals.
1 answer
The Roman numerals lvi or LVI converted into Arabic numerals are 56
1 answer
MCMCV in Roman numerals is equivalent to 2005 in standard Arabic numerals.
1 answer
The Roman numerals of MCIII are equivalent to 1103 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
1 answer
In Arabic numerals, it is 616.
In Roman numerals, it is DCXVI.
1 answer
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numerals are possible.
1 answer
Babylonian numerals have a base of 60 while the Hindu-Arabic numerals have a base of 10
1 answer
The Roman numerals of CCXXXVII are the equivalent of 237 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
2 answers
In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.
In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.
In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.
In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.
In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.
In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.
In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.
In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.
In Roman numerals 522 would be DXXII.
4 answers
Indian numerals came to be called Hindu- Arabic numerals for many reasons. Some of those reasons are because they were originated from India where they were using the numerals for 1 to 9 for more than 2,000 years. Arab traders then brought these numerals to the West, As a result, we call them Arabic numerals, or Hindu-Arabic numerals.
1 answer
"Blake" has no meaning in Hebrew. Only Hebrew names have meaning in Hebrew.
3 answers
74 in Roman numerals is LXXIV
74 in Roman numerals would be LXXIV1 answer
XCIII is already expressed in Roman numerals. As Arabic numerals, it is equal to 93.
1 answer
The Roman numerals of DCXXXII are the equivalent of 632 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
1 answer
The Roman numerals of CCX are the equivalent of 210 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
1 answer
