Results for gag rule
On this page:
 
Dictionary:

gag rule


n.

A rule, as in a legislative body, limiting discussion or debate on an issue. Also called gag law.


 
 

Parliamentary device to limit debate; specifically, one of a series of resolutions passed by the U.S. Congress that tabled without discussion petitions regarding slavery (1836 – 40). It was introduced by proslavery members to postpone consideration of antislavery petitions encouraged by the American Anti-Slavery Society. It was repealed in 1844 due to efforts of John Quincy Adams and others.

For more information on gag rule, visit Britannica.com.

 

In 1836 the House of Representatives established a “gag rule” to try to stop citizens from submitting antislavery petitions. Previously, the House and Senate had simply referred such petitions to committee without ever acting on them. But when petitioners called for Congress to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia, which Congress supervised, Southern representatives sought to put an end to this “agitation.” Together with sympathetic Northerners, they voted 117 to 68 to adopt a “gag rule” that required the House to lay antislavery petitions on the table (meaning to put them aside) immediately, without printing them, referring them to committee, or in any way debating them. Representative John Quincy Adams (Whig-Massachusetts) led the opposition to what he called an unconstitutional attempt to suppress the freedom to petition. Adams lost repeated battles and came close to being censured. By 1844, enough Northerners had changed their position, and the House voted 105 to 80 to repeal the “gag rule.”

See also Adams, John Quincy; Petition, citizens' right to

Sources

  • Leonard L. Richards, The Life and Times of Congressman John Quincy Adams (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986)
 

Gag rule is a parliamentary device that permits legislative bodies to suppress or shorten debate. This rule was used by the House of Representatives from 1836 to 1844 to avoid debating the thousands of antislavery petitions being sent to northern congressmen. Southern legislators had come to interpret any debate of slavery as a hostile act, and many northerners, though personally opposed to slavery, were prepared to avoid the topic, either out of a belief that Congress had no rights in the matter or simply in the interests of political harmony. The petition movement, sponsored by the American Anti-Slavery Society, enraged the southerners and made it more difficult for northern politicians to remain silent. In addition, because the petitions focused on the District of Columbia, where Congress was the sole authority, the argument that slavery was a matter for the states to decide did not apply.

The Senate rejected the southerners' proposal that petitioning be prohibited but preserved harmony by denying each petition as it arrived. The House, however, adopted a gag rule on May 18, 1836, whereby all petitions related to slavery would automatically be tabled. This rule, which required renewal at each session, was allowed to lapse briefly when Congress opened in December 1837, but the immediate presentation of petitions on the House floor led to an even stricter gag rule, which was renewed annually for the next six years. Former president John Quincy Adams (now a congressman) had fought the gag rule from the first, and widespread public protests reinforced his arguments. Gradually, more and more northern congressmen came to feel that, whatever one's position on slavery, limiting citizens' right of petition was indefensible. In December 1844, the gag rule was rescinded.

In fact, the abolitionists had gained more from the gag rule than they had lost. They had frequently warned that the "slave power's" growing control of the federal government would ultimately destroy all Americans' liberties. By its demonstration of how efforts to placate the South led directly to the abridgment of constitutional rights, the gag rule made converts even among those who did not favor abolition.

See also Abolitionist Movement; House of Representatives.


 
in parliamentary procedure, rules limiting or prohibiting free debate on a particular issue. In U.S. history, the term is applied especially to procedural rules in force in the House of Representatives from 1836 to 1844. With the growth of antislavery feeling after the founding of the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1833, the House was deluged with thousands of antislavery petitions, most of which requested the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia. Southerners, with the aid of Northern Democrats, secured passage of the gag rules, which prevented the discussion of antislavery proposals in the House. The fight to secure the right of petition, waged virtually singlehandedly, and brilliantly, by John Quincy Adams, aroused the North, and the gag rules were repealed. They had the effect of strengthening the cause of the abolitionists.


 
This entry contains information applicable to United States law only.

A rule, regulation, or law that prohibits debate or discussion of a particular issue.

Between 1836 and 1844, the U.S. House of Representatives adopted a series of resolutions and rules that banned petitions calling for the abolition of slavery. Known as gag rules, these measures effectively tabled antislavery petitions without submitting them to usual House procedures. Public outcry over the gag rules ultimately aided the antislavery cause, and the fierce House debate concerning their future anticipated later conflicts over slavery.

The submission of petitions to Congress has been a feature of the U.S. political system ever since its inception. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees "the right of the people … to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." First used in England, petitions have been considered an important means for the people to communicate grievances to their representatives or other public officials.

When the first gag rule was instituted in 1836, House protocol required that the first thirty days of each session of Congress be devoted to the reading of petitions from constituents. After those thirty days, petitions were read in the House every other Monday. Each petition was read aloud, printed, and assigned to an appropriate committee, which could choose to address or ignore it. This traditional procedure had been interrupted in 1835, when the House began to receive a large number of petitions advocating the abolition of slavery. Many of the petitions were organized by the American Anti-Slavery Society, which had formed in 1833.

Southern representatives, many of whom were slave owners and entertained no thoughts of abolishing slavery, were outraged by the antislavery petitions. In December 1835, southerners, uniting with northern Democrats, won a vote to table a petition that called for the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia. Breaking established precedent, the pro-slavery faction also won a vote to deny the petition its usual discussion, printing, and referral to committee.

This procedure for the "gagging" of abolition petitions was made into a formal resolution by the House on May 26, 1836: "All petitions, memorials, resolutions, propositions, or papers, relating in any way, or to any extent whatsoever, to the subject of slavery or the abolition of slavery, shall, without being either printed or referred, be laid on the table and … no further action whatever shall be had thereon." The resolution incited strong opposition from many northerners, who perceived it as a violation of their time-honored civil rights. John Quincy Adams, a former president and now a representative from Massachusetts, emerged as the leader of an effort to revoke the new resolution. John C. Calhoun (D-S.C.), although a member of the Senate rather than the House, orchestrated the battle to preserve it.

The pro-slavery faction succeeded in renewing the gag resolution, which expired at the end of each session of Congress, in both sessions of the Twenty-fifth Congress (1837-39). On January 28, 1840, it succeeded again when it won a vote to turn the resolution into House Rule 21 (in later versions, Rules 23 and 25):

No petition, memorial, resolution, or other paper praying the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia, or any State or Territory, or the slave trade between the States or Territories of the United States, in which it now exists, shall be received by this House, or entertained in any way whatever.

As a formal House rule rather than a resolution, the gag rule was now a permanent part of House procedure and did not have to be renewed by vote each session.

This new gag rule provoked even stronger opposition. Whereas the previous gag resolution tabled antislavery petitions after they were received, the new gag rule did not allow petitions to be received. It was also more extreme than the Senate's approach, which was to receive such petitions but answer them in the negative. As a result of these changes, northerners who had previously supported the gag now joined Adams in opposing it. Several years later, on December 3, 1844, those opposed to the gag rule finally succeeded in rescinding it.

The term gag rule was also applied to regulations issued by the administration of President Ronald Reagan in 1988. These regulations (53 Fed. Reg. 2923-2924) banned all abortion counseling by employees of the four thousand family planning clinics funded by the federal Title X Program of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.A. §§ 300-300a-6). The regulations also prohibited referrals to clinics that perform abortions. In one of his first acts as president, Bill Clinton revoked the gag rule by executive order on January 22, 1993 (58 Fed. Reg. 7455, 1993 WL 2406 [Pres.]), allowing clinics to counsel pregnant women on all family planning options, including abortion.

See: Congress of the United States.

 
Wikipedia: gag rule

A gag rule is a rule that limits or forbids the consideration or discussion of a topic.

Anti-slavery petitions in the United States Congress in 1831-1844

The gagging of anti-slavery petitions by Congress occurred from 1835 to 1844. Pro-slavery forces had prevented any discussion of slavery in Congress, so anti-slavery forces, starting in about 1831, had submitted petitions for the abolition of slavery, believing that since there was a right to petition the government as guaranteed in the First Amendment of the Constitution, such petitions, and thus slavery itself, would have to be discussed.

The pro-slavery forces responded with a series of gag rules that automatically "tabled" all such petitions, preventing them from being read or discussed.

The House passed the Pinckney Resolutions on May 26, 1836, the third of which was known from the beginning as the "gag rule" and passed with a vote of 117 to 68 (The first stated that Congress had no constitutional authority to interfere with slavery in the states and the second that it "ought not" do so in the District of Columbia.) From their inception, Representative (and former President) John Quincy Adams was a central figure in the opposition to the gag rules, which included the overwhelming majority of Northern Whigs. Since the original gag was a resolution, not a standing House Rule, it had to be renewed every session, and Adams and others had free rein until then. In January, 1837, the Pinckney Resolutions were substantially renewed, more than a month into the session. The pro-gag forces gradually succeeded in shortening the debate and tightening the gag. In December, 1837, the Congress passed the Patton Resolutions, introduced by J. M. Patton of Virginia. In December, 1838 the Congress passed the Atherton Gag, composed by Democratic States-Rights Congressman Atherton of New Hampshire, on the first petition day of the session. In January, 1840, the House of Representatives passed the Twenty-first Rule, which greatly changed the nature of the fight - it prohibited even the reception of anti-slavery petitions and was a standing House rule. Before, the pro-slavery forces had to struggle to impose a gag before the anti-slavery forces got the floor. Now men like Adams or Slade were trying to revoke a standing rule. However, it had less support than the original Pinckney gag, passing only by 114 to 108, with substantial opposition among Northern Democrats and even some Southern Whigs, and with serious doubts about its constitutionality. Throughout the gag period, Adams' "superior talent in using and abusing parliamentary ruiles" and skill in baiting his enemies into making mistakes, enabled him to evade the rule. The gag was finally rescinded in December, 1844 by a vote of 108-80, all the Northern and 4 Southern Whigs voting for repeal, along with 78% of the Northern Democrats.

In the Senate in 1836, John C. Calhoun attempted to introduce a gag rule. The Senate rejected this proposal, but agreed on a method which, while technically not violating the right to petition, would achieve the same effect. If an anti-slavery petition was presented, the Senate would vote not on whether to accept the petition but on whether to consider the question of receiving the petition.

References

  • Richards, Leonard L. (1986). The Life and Times of Congressman John Quincy Adams. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-504026-0. 

External links


 
 

Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "gag rule" at WikiAnswers.

 

Copyrights:

Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
US Government Guide. The Oxford Guide to the United States Government. Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1998, 2001, 2002 by John J. Patrick, Richard M. Pious, Donald M. Ritchie. All rights reserved.  Read more
US History Companion. The Reader's Companion to American History, Eric Foner and John A. Garraty, Editors, published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/  Read more
Law Encyclopedia. West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Copyright © 1998 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Gag rule" Read more

Search for answers directly from your browser with the FREE Answers.com Toolbar!  
Click here to download now. 

Get Answers your way! Check out all our free tools and products.

On this page:   E-mail   print Print  Link  

 

Keep Reading

Mentioned In:

Related Topics