answersLogoWhite

0

Search results

Executive privilege does not apply when the president is under a criminal investigation.

1 answer



"No, the Executive Privilege is the right of the President, but not only him or her. The other official leaders and congress men may have this privilege as well."

1 answer


executives privilege

1 answer


Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp

With executive privilege, the president is allowed to overstep congressional authority, and not answer to Congress's efforts to question his or her actions. With the series of checks and balances that are established in the Constitution, this particular privilege is puzzling. Some believe that executive privilege is a fallacy, and that congressional approval is absolute.

1 answer


Executive privilege should not be eliminated. It is legal for the President of the United States to use executive privilege where the President makes the final decision as the President feels would be best. It has been used many, many times.

1 answer





No, except at the beginning of a sentence because it is

n

ot a proper

n

ou

n.

2 answers


Nixon claimed Executive Privilege in not releasing the tapes.

1 answer


executive privilege.

Executive Privilege is not an unlimited right to refuse. It extends only to those topics or areas which are critical for the President to retain privacy in order to accomplish his role as Executive.

As such, it was possible for Congress to compel Bill Clinton to testify regarding the Whitewater affair.

8 answers




A magic bannana, erik

1 answer


Perhaps with the exception of the Supreme Court, any untrammeled privilege is a danger.

1 answer








United States V. Nixon

1 answer


"Executive privilege" is a term used by the United States government. In layman's terms, it refers to the ability of the President to overrule interventions from the other two branches of government.

1 answer


Because it gives the President powers to, among other things, hide information and pardon prisoners. This gives the Executive powers exceeding constitutional authority. Executive Privilege was extremely controversial when, during the Watergate proceedings, Nixon tried to use it to justify his actions.

Furthermore, it gives the president the ability to hide information from the people, which can be viewed as unconstitutional. However, Executive Privilege itself tends to be less controversial than its use.

"Executive privilege" is controversial because it is unconstitutional. However, the power of the President to pardon prisoners is constitutional.

1 answer


Because it gives the President powers to, among other things, hide information and pardon prisoners. This gives the Executive powers exceeding constitutional authority. Executive Privilege was extremely controversial when, during the Watergate proceedings, Nixon tried to use it to justify his actions.

Furthermore, it gives the president the ability to hide information from the people, which can be viewed as unconstitutional. However, Executive Privilege itself tends to be less controversial than its use.

"Executive privilege" is controversial because it is unconstitutional. However, the power of the President to pardon prisoners is constitutional.

1 answer


The ability of the president and executive officials to withhold information from or refuse to appear before Congress or the courts.

1 answer




No, this is an internet myth. The president has used Executive Privilege once since he took office, and that instance had nothing to do with amending any laws. The president's two immediate predecessors used Executive Privilege far more frequently: President Bush invoked the power six times and President Clinton used it 14 times.

1 answer


to the southern states its to be able to eat stuff

1 answer



Invoking the inherent power of executive privilege.

1 answer


Executive privilege is a certain "power" claimed by the President to avoid subpoenas and other interventions by other parts of the government. It comes from a Supreme Court ruling and not from the Constitution like a lot of people think.

2 answers


One example of executive privilege is the case of U.S. v. Nixon. This case focused on the criminal case of President Nixon and his invoking of privilege in order to refuse to produce copies of phone calls that took place in the Oval Office.

4 answers


George Washington was the first American president to take advantage of the term executive privilege. This incident took place in 1792 when George Washington refused to give information to the congressional comittee.

1 answer



New York City

MLA Citation

Van Meter, Larry A., and Tim McNeese. United States V. Nixon: The Question of Executive Privilege. New York, NY: Chelsea House Publications, 2007.

1 answer


It is more of a privilege than an absolute power because of the checks and balances in the government.

(Checks and balances is were different branches of the government [executive, judicial, legislative] have to go through each other to get things done within the government)

-Sprat

1 answer


Nixon sought to invoke "executive privilege". Executive privilege isthe power claimed by thePresident of the United Statesand other members of theexecutive branchto resist certainsubpoenasand other interventions by thelegislativeandjudicial branchesof government. The concept of executive privilege is not mentioned explicitly in theUnited States Constitution, but theSupreme Court of the United Statesruled it to be an element of theseparation of powersdoctrine, and/or derived from the supremacy of executive branch in its own area of Constitutional activity

TheSupreme Courtconfirmed the legitimacy of this doctrine inUnited States v. Nixon, but only to the extent of confirming that there is a qualified privilege. Once invoked, a presumption of privilege is established, requiring the Prosecutor to make a "sufficient showing" that the "Presidential material" is "essential to the justice of the case."(418 U.S. at 713-14).Chief JusticeBurgerfurther stated that executive privilege would most effectively apply when the oversight of the executive would impair that branch's national security concerns. In the case of Watergate, national security was NOT the issue at hand.

1 answer


The rule of law over executive privilege.

1 answer




Executive privilege is permitted as long as it does not interfere with due process.

1 answer


What reason did the president give for justifying his claim of executive privilege

1 answer


One example of executive privilege is the case of U.S. v. Nixon. This case focused on the criminal case of President Nixon and his invoking of privilege in order to refuse to produce copies of phone calls that took place in the Oval Office.

1 answer


Executive privilege is permitted as long as it does not interfere with due process.

1 answer


The President can use all of his powers as soon as he takes office.

1 answer


Executive privilege is permitted as long as it does not interfere with due process.

1 answer


In the modern age, it was Bill Clinton, who used executive privilege at least twelve times (some sources say fourteen). But George W. Bush used Signing Statements more than any other president (over 800 times).

1 answer