answersLogoWhite

0

Espionage

Espionage is more commonly referred to as spying, and it intrigues people the world over thanks to the daring and mysterious depiction of espionage in the media. However, in legal terms, espionage is defined as obtaining and spreading information without the knowledge or permission of the holder of that information.

312 Questions

There were a number of Southern spies in the North especially in?

during the American Civil War. These spies worked covertly to gather intelligence on Union military plans and activities. They often posed as sympathizers or neutral parties, and some even infiltrated Union army camps or worked as double agents. Their information was valuable to the Confederate forces, as it helped them gain an advantage in the war.

What was the definition of the Espionage and Sedition Acts according to the Supreme Court in Schenck vs. US?

Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)

In Schenck, the Court only interpreted the Espionage Act of 1917 (ch. 30, tit. I § 3, 40 Stat. 217, 219), and did not address the more restrictive language in the Sedition Act of 1918 (also known as the Alien and Sedition Act of 1918).

The Espionage Act of 1917 allowed criminal conviction of anyone who "when the United States is at war, shall willfully make or convey false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies and whoever when the United States is at war, shall willfully cause or attempt to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or shall willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or of the United States."

According to the Justice Holmes in the opinion of the Court, Congress was justified in its intent to prevent "[obstructing] the recruiting or enlistment service." Conviction under the Act was not dependent on the defendant's success in thwarting military goals.

"The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right. It seems to be admitted that, if an actual obstruction of the recruiting service were proved, liability for words that produced that effect might be enforced.

"The statute of 1917, in § 4, punishes conspiracies to obstruct, as well as actual obstruction. If the act (speaking, or circulating a paper), its tendency, and the intent with which it is done are the same, we perceive no ground for saying that success alone warrants making the act a crime. Goldman v. United States, 245 U. S. 474, 245 U. S. 477. Indeed, that case might be said to dispose of the present contention if the precedent covers all media concludendi. But, as the right to free speech was not referred to specially, we have thought fit to add a few words.

"It was not argued that a conspiracy to obstruct the draft was not within the words of the Act of 1917. The words are "obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service," and it might be suggested that they refer only to making it hard to get volunteers. Recruiting heretofore usually having been accomplished by getting volunteers, the word is apt to call up that method only in our minds. But recruiting is gaining fresh supplies for the forces, as well by draft as otherwise. It is put as an alternative to enlistment or voluntary enrollment in this act."

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

How many seasons does totally spies have?

5, but according to a French Article (Since Totally Spies was made by the French company Marathon Production) There WILLbe a Season 6, coming in 2013.

Were the Espionage and Sedition Acts justifiable in a time of war?

The Espionage and Sedition Acts were not justifiable. They suspended essential rights, outlined in the Bill of Rights, and made the act of speaking out in opposition a crime. The suspension of rights are never justifiable, whatever the reasons.

What TV show had Russian spies Boris Badenov and Natasha Fatale?

The TV show that featured Russian spies Boris Badenov and Natasha Fatale was "The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show."

Are spies Good guys or Bad guys?

Spies can be both good guys and bad guys, depending on their intentions and actions. Spies working for a just cause, such as protecting national security or thwarting terrorist attacks, can be seen as the "good guys." However, spies involved in unethical activities, espionage against innocent civilians, or destabilizing foreign governments can be considered the "bad guys." Ultimately, the morality of spies is determined by their objectives and the methods they employ.

Was sputnik used to spy?

No, it was far too crude for that.

Sputnik 1 was mainly to prove that a man-made object could be put in orbit and remain functioning there.

What city were a number of Southern spies in the North located?

Yes. During the Civil War, the South had a number of spies in the North, with two networks in Washington alone.

What did they do to spies in the Revolutionary War as torture?

The British received harsh treatment from the Patriots in many ways. One way is that the Patriots covered the British soldiers in hot tar and then goose feathers. They burned British townsfolk's houses down because they honored King George the third. They also threw rocks at his picture because they dispised him so much. Lastly, they made effigies (dummies) of him and burned them. They were not as cruel as you think that they were. You can be surprised sometimes.

What Espionage Act of 1917 forbid?

It went far beyond control of spies. the Espionage and sedition act, the propaganda portions, went so far to suppress anything that might be deemed harmful to the morale of the armed forces and the War Effort- it is conceivable if this law ( repealed in the twenties) was still up in the early seventies certain popular songs of an anti-war thematic- such as Give Peace a Chance- and more obviously seditious- if not mutinous in theme- Freda Payne"s Bring the Boys home that actually had two lines- Turn the Ships around! Everybody- Lay your Weapons Down! this song was banned in some places and bases for obvious reasons. The Espionage and sedition ( roughly anti-patriotic or treasonous conduct) laws were enacted in l9l7- do NOT confuse with War Powers act which is still , no pun intended, in Force- also came out in l9l7.

Who was executed for espionage?

In peace time- not during a regular, declared Military action- it would probaly be Mr. Julius Rosenberg, along with his wife, Ethel. This occured in peacetime. both were convicted in having conducted espionage on highly secretive US weapons systems-such as the Implosion type fuse used to detonate A-bombs. the material was so secret even the technical documents used evasive language such as Lenses to focus detonating waves- rather than merely ( Fuse imploder). a deadly serious matter of the Cold war. These devices had and still have, no civilian application.

What Examples for prohibited activities for the espionage act 1917?

The Espionage Act of 1917 made it illegal to own or process any national intelligence information. In the first few months after its enactment, over 900 people were imprisoned for breaking this law.

Was Rahab and her family saved when the Israelites took Jericho because she protected Joshua's spies?

Rahab hide the spices in her home from the soldiers of Jericho until night fall and was asked to place a scarlet ribbon out her window the day of the attack and anyone in her home would be spared.

Why do you think Mauryan kings employed spies?

The Mauryan kings employed spies mainly to find out about their enemy's plans of attack so that he could make better ones to attack hos enemy. By attacking enemies, the king became more powerful, thus gaining more land and larger armies

What is the difference between espionage and intelligence?

Espionage and Spy are synonyms. synonyms: two words that have the same meaning

Were Japanese Americans during ww II convicted of espionage?

No Japanese Americans at all were convicted of Espionage. Even so, when they left camps, they faced discrimination and rasicsm.

How did the espionage act and the sedition act of 1918 violate the 1 amendment?

They were the Alien and Sedition Acts, enacted by John Adams. Among other things, parts of the Acts violated the 1st Amendment because it made it illegal to give 'bad press' to a public official (like John Adams, himself, a constant and merciless target of ridicule and insult masterminded by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison on the Democratic-Republican side and Alexander Hamilton (among others) on the Federalist side). One would want to search query the Acts to find out everything about them.

What is an example of espionage?

An example of espionage, would be the acquisition of the Jerry Can, by Allied forces in World War 2. A German engineer and his American college Paul Pleiss had built a vehicle to travel India. The German, realising they had no way to store spare fuel and water, took several Jerry Cans, which had been secretly developed by the Nazi prior to the war, from the stockpile at a German airport. When the inadvertent theft was discovered, the Luftwaffe was dispatched to arrest the German engineer. Paul Pleiss however, had continued on with both the vehicle and the cans. Eventually the cans made their way back to America and the Allied forces and were subsequently reused by the Allied forces.

Espionage may take many forms, including theft of informational intelligence documents, dissemination of false informational intelligence in an attempt to deceive an opponent, and theft of strategic assets, such as the Jerry can.

Espionage is distinctly different from sabotage, in that espionage does not use direct destruction against strategic assets.