0
No. A comma precedes "such as" when what follows is an example of whatever went before. In this case, it is nonrestrictive. (For nonrestrictive constructions: use a comma.)
Example
My favorite flavors of candy are fruit flavors, such as cherry and lemon.
The sentence is complete and the idea is complete without the list of specific instances. The list just illustrates the meaning of "fruit flavors" but does not restrict it. So it is nonrestrictive and needs a comma.
You don't use a comma before "such as" when what follows defines or limits what went before. In this case it is restrictive. (For restrictive constructions: no comma.) Example
The refugees were unable to carry things such as clothes, bedding, and furniture.
Here, what comes after "such as" serves to define (restrict) the idea of "things." The category isn't named. The list is necessary to explain what kinds of things the refugees had to leave behind. The category might be "household goods," but it isn't stated--instead, the "such as" list supplies the definition. It is restrictive. No comma.
(It would be better English to say "such things as...," but this wording stresses the parallel example.)
If you rewrote this sentence to name the category, you would then not need the comma:
The refugees were unable to carry their household goods, such as clothes, bedding, and furniture.
4 answers
last comma before the and is not necessary
1 answer
No. A comma precedes "such as" when what follows is an example of whatever went before. In this case, it is nonrestrictive. (For nonrestrictive constructions: use a comma.)
Example
My favorite flavors of candy are fruit flavors, such as cherry and lemon.
The sentence is complete and the idea is complete without the list of specific instances. The list just illustrates the meaning of "fruit flavors" but does not restrict it. So it is nonrestrictive and needs a comma.
You don't use a comma before "such as" when what follows defines or limits what went before. In this case it is restrictive. (For restrictive constructions: no comma.) Example
The refugees were unable to carry things such as clothes, bedding, and furniture.
Here, what comes after "such as" serves to define (restrict) the idea of "things." The category isn't named. The list is necessary to explain what kinds of things the refugees had to leave behind. The category might be "household goods," but it isn't stated--instead, the "such as" list supplies the definition. It is restrictive. No comma.
(It would be better English to say "such things as...," but this wording stresses the parallel example.)
If you rewrote this sentence to name the category, you would then not need the comma:
The refugees were unable to carry their household goods, such as clothes, bedding, and furniture.
1 answer
If a sentence consists of two independent clauses with a comma between them, it is a comma splice. That is, the part before the comma can stand on its own as a sentence, and the part after the comma can also stand on its own as a sentence, then it is a comma splice. If there is no punctuation there instead of a comma, it is known as a run-on sentence.
2 answers
No, they don't and I don't know if it's comma like coe-ma or comma like comma, and if it was a comma like comma, it would be an apostrophe.
2 answers
A comma splice is such a comma, when it collects two independent clauses are connected by only a comma. The following example illustrates a comma splice: the job is hard, get some rest.
1 answer
Comma comes from the Greek word komma meaning a piece cut off.
1 answer
No, I believe that the comma is before the 'or', or I may be mistaken.
1 answer
No, don't use a comma after "and" in a series.
There are two acceptable comma styles for series. One includes a comma before the final "and" (red, yellow, and blue). The other does not include the final comma (red, yellow and blue).
1 answer
12 units
1 answer
A comma splice is the attempt to join two independent clauses with a comma without a coordinating conjunction. For example, "She walked the dog last night, today she fed it."
2 answers
the comma would be before Or In A Sentencee. =]
2 answers
Not necessarily. The comma indicates a pause in speech. Use a comma after "but" only to indicate a noticeable pause in speech. If there is no pause, there should be no comma.
1 answer
Yes, a comma is usually placed before the word "or" when joining two independent clauses in a sentence. This is known as the serial comma or Oxford comma.
1 answer
The serial comma is also called the Oxford comma because it is commonly used by writers and editors at Oxford University Press. The use of the serial comma helps clarify lists by separating each item with a comma, including before the conjunction.
2 answers
No, there is no comma in the title "America the Beautiful."
1 answer
Do not put a space before a comma. Put one space afterthe comma.
1 answer
if you mean an apostrophe, it would be Tina's or for a comma you would just place the comma at the end of the person's name.
1 answer
If your question is the following then there should be no comma: Should there be a comma after "a man by the name of _______"?
No comma is needed.
2 answers
You ussualy put a comma before the conjuction. On rare evernts you put the comma after.
2 answers
no .
Additional: 'Which' sometimes has a comma before it, but it depends on the sentence. I find it hard to imagine a situation when 'which' would have a comma after it.
2 answers
add a comma after the semicolon.
4 answers
exclamation poi
nt.
It should be-- Hi!
5 answers
No. After the word and comma can not be used, as it is grammatically inappropriate to use comma after conjunctions such as and, which are called coordinate conjunctions.
1 answer
You can use ", and" or just "and" but not just a comma.
1 answer
No comma is necessary.
1 answer
no. if but before is a sentence on its on and after but is a sentence on its own then put a comma before but.
1 answer
comma
1 answer
The use of a comma does not depend on the word, it depends on the sentence structure. At times a comma will follow 'which' and at other times it will not.
2 answers
