burden of proof
1 answer
It's called a proof
1 answer
There is no exactness when describing the relative burdens of proof, different courts have different articulations. Preponderance of the evidence means the evidence supports one conclusion over another no matter how slightly, clear and convincing means the evidence clearly supports one conclusion over another, and beyond a reasonable doubt means that the evidence comes at least close to supporting only one conclusion. Clear and convincing is often required to overcome a legal presumption, such as appealing a guilty plea, finding mental incompetency, or arguing an apparently valid contract is the product of fraud.
1 answer
The clause beyond reasonable doubt simply means that there is enough evidence to convince the judge that you have committed the act or in other word, the crime.
That is the standard which must be met for conviction of a defendant in a criminal trial. Notice that the standard is not, "beyond ALL doubt," - only beyond REASONABLE doubt.
REASONABLE DOUBT - The level of certainty a juror must have to find a defendant guilty of a crime. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. However, it does not mean beyond ALL doubt.
See below link:
4 answers
hgioufd-u776wacn,lpoyul;p[pokmbvsww246jj[jlkkhytjte;htoewhthtuytiowitythea;;;jh
The above is fairly convincing proof that the original answerer did not have the intelligence of the average fetus.
1 answer
A convincing argument is supported by strong evidence, logical reasoning, and clear presentation. Additionally, considering counterarguments and addressing them effectively can also contribute to making an argument more convincing.
1 answer
No, "cogent" is not an adverb. It is an adjective used to describe an argument or point that is clear, logical, and convincing.
2 answers
Cogent means convincing or persuasive, usually as a result of being well-reasoned and supported by evidence. A cogent argument is clear, logical, and compelling.
2 answers
Unless there is someone who can provide clear and convincing proof otherwise, it is assumed that each of you owns one half of the total amount in the checking account.
1 answer
If someone found proof of dragons existing then there is a clear answer. They exist lol
1 answer
He uses parallelism to create a strong rhythm and memorable ideas. - Apex :)
1 answer
The burden of proof for atheism lies in the lack of evidence or convincing arguments for the existence of a deity or deities. Atheists do not assert the non-existence of gods, but rather lack belief in them due to insufficient evidence.
1 answer
whats means a supports a main idea by providing clear evidence or proof without using numbers
1 answer
whats means a supports a main idea by providing clear evidence or proof without using numbers
1 answer
When asked to restate something on a project, you are require to explain something differently to make it more clear or convincing.
1 answer
Criminal cases require proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Federal courts have refused to give juries a definition "reasonable doubt," since it is possible that such a definition might not equate to the reasonable doubt standard causing a constitutional issue on the validity of the conviction. The Federal courts leave it to the jury to determine. Curiously, there are varying practices among the various federal circuits as to the best practice with some circuits actually criticizing other circuits.
The BoP for civil cases varies - from 'preponderance of the evidence', to 'clear and convincing'.
Under the preponderance of the evidence standard, in general, you just need to prove it's more probable than not that your view is the correct view of the facts. If the proofs are equal in nature, the burden has not been met. The term "equal" relates to the quality of proof, not the quantity of proof or number of witnesses.
The 'clear and convincing' standard is a higher burden of proof than the preponderance of the evidence standard. It has been defined as that which proves in the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction as to truth of allegations sought to be established, evidence so weighty and convincing as to enable a factfinder to come to clear conviction, without hesitancy, of truth of precise facts in issue.
The various burdens of proof are never defined in terms of percentages.
Under no circumstance, however, is the BoP as high for a civil case as it is for a criminal case.
For instance; that is why the Goldman family could get a civil judgment against OJ Simpson, even if the government couldn't convict him of the crime.
1 answer
The leader must present a cogent (clear, logical, and convincing) argument.
1 answer
The leader must present a cogent (clear, logical, and convincing) argument.
1 answer
so that they can have a clear an valid point to the argument, with proof.
1 answer
One way to support a main idea without using numbers is to provide specific examples, anecdotes, or quotes that illustrate the point being made. By using detailed evidence, you can help make your argument more convincing and engaging for the reader.
1 answer
Empirical proof is "dependent on evidence or consequences that are observable by the senses. Empirical data is data that is produced by experiment or observation."
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical )
"In mathematics, a proof is a convincing demonstration that some mathematical statement is necessarily true, within the accepted standards of the field. A proof is a logically deduced argument, not an empirical one."
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof )
1 answer
A sound disapproval is a strong and convincing expression of disapproval or disagreement. It is a clear and authoritative way of expressing one's objection or opposition to something.
1 answer
If a girl is sure she doesn't want *you*, move on and respect her wishes.
1 answer
He uses parallelism to create a strong rhythm and memorable ideas. :)
1 answer
You should have it proof read by a variety of English majors and people who specialize in it but you need to make it very convincing more than anything.
1 answer
"Bayyinah" is an Arabic word that means clear evidence, proof, or clarity. In Islamic theology, it refers to clear and conclusive evidence that is unmistakable and leaves no room for doubt. It is frequently mentioned in the Qur'an to highlight the importance of clear signs and proofs for believing in God.
2 answers
clear-cut, barefaced, conspicuous, axiomatic, distinct, and fact
2 answers
Reasonable doubt is the level of certainty a juror must have to find a defendant guilty of a crime. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the conduct of your own important affairs.
However, it does not mean beyond ALL doubt.
1 answer
sensible, fair, convincing, probable, valid, wise, relevant, rational, necessary, legit, judicious, intelligent, analytical, reasonable, clear
1 answer
sensible, fair, convincing, probable, valid, wise, relevant, rational, necessary, legit, judicious, intelligent, analytical, reasonable, clear
1 answer
The standard of proof refers to the level of certainty required to prove a claim in court, such as "beyond a reasonable doubt" in criminal cases or "preponderance of the evidence" in civil cases. The burden of proof, on the other hand, is the responsibility of the party making the claim to provide evidence and convince the court of its validity. In essence, the standard of proof sets the bar for how convincing the evidence must be, while the burden of proof determines who has the obligation to meet that standard.
1 answer
If there is available proof that the car is subject to the lien then you will need to pay it if you want to own the car free and clear. You could sue the seller.
If there is available proof that the car is subject to the lien then you will need to pay it if you want to own the car free and clear. You could sue the seller.
If there is available proof that the car is subject to the lien then you will need to pay it if you want to own the car free and clear. You could sue the seller.
If there is available proof that the car is subject to the lien then you will need to pay it if you want to own the car free and clear. You could sue the seller.
2 answers
Taking a critical thinking class, huh? Anyhow....a proof surrogate is when someone makes a statement such as "everybody knows this", or "studies show" without actually giving any statistics for something....it is when they keep saying the same thing trying to be convincing. Hope this helps.
1 answer
bullet proof glass
1 answer
August 15, 2009 There were no silver proof sets issued in 1979. The clad proof set sold for $9 in 1979. During the mintage year, the dies used to make proof coins were changed which resulted in 2 mint mark varieties: the "filled S" and the "clear S". The "filled S" mint mark appears inflated and difficult to read while the "clear S" is clear and easy to read. The "filled S" sets are valued at $10 today. The "clear S" sets are valued at $120 today.
1 answer
Not exactly.
Definition: A procedural system refers to, and provides, the rules for applying substantive law to real disputes. A procedural system provides guidelines as to what information is received by the judge or jury, how that information is to be presented, and what by standards of proof ("beyond a reasonable doubt," "by clear and convincing evidence," "by a preponderance of the evidence") the information will be judged.
1 answer
sensible, fair, convincing, probable, valid, wise, relevant, rational, necessary, legit, judicious, intelligent, analytical, reasonable, clear
1 answer
A quick verdict in a legal proceeding typically favors the party that presents a strong and convincing case with clear evidence and arguments.
1 answer
You cannot prove a negative. In order to prove that something is NOT real you first have to try to prove that it is real and fail. This has been known since the time of Aristotle. So the only proof that you can have of something not being real is a lack of proof of its existence. Not a convincing argument.
1 answer
I always use Cornelle dishware. They have some very beautiful patterns and they are just about shatter proof.
1 answer
You need to record proof of death in order to clear the title.
1 answer
To be convincing, you should present strong evidence to support your argument, use logical reasoning to make your points clear, and be confident in your delivery. It's important to listen actively to the other person's perspective and address any concerns they may have. Additionally, building rapport and credibility can help increase your persuasiveness.
1 answer
yes you can. Because the water is clear it is possible if you dont have water proof sunscreen
1 answer
It is not clear when maracas were invented. However, there is proof that they were used about 1500 year ago in Columbia.
1 answer