'Assault' (sometimes called "simple assault" is an assault by unwanted touching using your hands or fists. 'Assault and Battery' means an unwanted touching using your hands using some striking object.
1 answer
Assault and Battery on a Police Officer is a serious criminal offense. There is a common misconception about Assault, and I'll explain this here.
Assault is not the unlawful touching of another person, that is Battery. Assault is to provoke fear in someone that you may batter them (hit them).
If you've been charged with Assault & Battery on a Police officer, it would be suggest that you seek legal counsel to protect your rights.
2 answers
Assault with intent to do great bodily harm is a felony. It can cause a person to get quite a bit of jail time and also pay a fine.
1 answer
There are many reported cases of assault with a deadly weapon. These cases often serve up very heavy fines and jail time.
2 answers
In Nebraska assault in the third degree occurs when a person threatens another or intentionally causes bodily injury to them. This usually gets a sentence of four to six months incarceration.
1 answer
No, but there is a mod for the computer version that allows weapons to shoot rockets.
1 answer
Under Va Code. Sec. 18.2-282, the specific offense of pointing, holding, or brandishing a gun is defined as a Class 1 misdemeanor, or a class 6 felony if the pointing occurs within 1,000 feet of a school.
2 answers
Regardless if you are a law abiding person or not, almost anyone could find themselves faced with an assault and battery charge - you don't have to be a criminal or a thug.
You can be charged with an assault and battery offense if you get in a fight, even if you didn’t start it. Yes, believe it or not, you can be arrested just for defending yourself from an attacker - especially if your attacker is trying to avoid jail time by accusing you of being the initiator.
If you get in a fight that was “mutual”, but you end up causing a more serious injury to the other person, you will be charged. If the police can’t sort it out, they will usually either arrest everyone, or just arrest the person who appeared to have done the most damage to the other. So, if the other person got the worst of it, you’ll be the one charged, regardless of how it actually happened. This is not to say you should not defend yourself, but just be aware of the consequences that may result.
You can also be charged with assault without even hitting or striking the person. If he or she claims you threatened violence, you can be arrested and charged. To understand why, you need to understand the definitions of assault and battery.
Assault and battery is the combination of two violent crimes: assault (the threat or attempt of violence) - or an act that causes another reasonably to fear an imminent battery(physical force/ violence) - the unlawful application of physical force to another. This legal distinction exists only in jurisdictions that distinguish assault as threatened violence rather than actual violence.
The main distinction between the two offenses is the existence or nonexistence of touching or contact. While contact is an essential element of battery, there must be an absence of contact for assault. Sometimes assault is defined loosely to include battery.
In Criminal Law, an assault may additionally be defined as any attempt to commit a battery.
At Common Law, as of the early 2000s, under virtually all criminal codes, they are either misdemeanors or felonies. They are characterized as felonious when accompanied by a criminal intent, such as intent to kill, rob, or rape, or when they are committed with a dangerous weapon.
Intent
Intent is an essential element of both offenses. Generally, it is only necessary for the defendant to have intent to do the act that causes the harm.
Defense
Consent In almost all states, consent is a defense to civil assault and battery. Some jurisdictions hold that in the case of mutual combat, consent will not suffice and either party may sue the other. Jurisdictions also differ on the question of whether consent is a defense to criminal assault and battery.
Consent must be given voluntarily in order to constitute a defense. If it is obtained by Fraud or duress or is otherwise unlawful, it will not suffice. When an act exceeds the scope of the given consent, the defense is not available. A person who participates in a football game implies consent to a certain amount of physical contact; however, the individual is not deemed to consent to contact beyond what is commonly permitted in the sport.
Disclaimer:
This article is a guideline and is not legal advice - No information here iswarrantedorguaranteedfor any purpose., as laws vary from state to state, it is not intended to be an all inclusive discussion of the law applicable to any action in your state. Please consult with a legal professional when appropriate - if you are charged with a crime, contact a criminal defense attorney.
[video=]
1 answer
Defenses
Consent In almost all states, consent is a defense to civil assault and battery. Some jurisdictions hold that in the case of mutual combat, consent will not suffice and either party may sue the other. Jurisdictions also differ on the question of whether consent is a defense to criminal assault and battery.
Consent must be given voluntarily in order to constitute a defense. If it is obtained by Fraud or duress or is otherwise unlawful, it will not suffice. When an act exceeds the scope of the given consent, the defense is not available. A person who participates in a football game implies consent to a certain amount of physical contact; however, the individual is not deemed to consent to contact beyond what is commonly permitted in the sport.
Self-Defense Generally, a person may use whatever degree of force is reasonably necessary for protection from bodily harm. Whether this defense is valid is usually determined by a jury. A person who initiates a fight cannot claim Self-Defenseunless the opponent responded with a greater and unforeseeable degree of force. When an aggressor retreats and is later attacked by the same opponent, the defense may be asserted or declared.
The use of Deadly Force in response may be justified if it is initially used by the aggressor. The situation must be such that a reasonable person would be likely to fear for his or her life. In some states, a person must retreat prior to using deadly force if the individual can do so in complete safety. A majority of states, however, allow a person to stand his or her ground even though there is a means of safe escape.
Whether the degree of force used is reasonable depends upon the circumstances. The usual test applied involves determining whether a reasonable person in a similar circumstance would respond with a similar amount of force. Factors such as age, size, and strength of the parties are also considered.
Performance of Duty and Authority A person may use reasonable force when it becomes necessary in the course of performing a duty. A police officer, for example, may use force when apprehending a criminal. In some jurisdictions, private citizens may also use reasonable force to stop a crime being committed in their presence. Certain businesses, such as restaurants or nightclubs, are authorized to hire employees (security/bouncers) who may use reasonable force to remove persons who disturb other patrons. Court officers, such as judges, may order the removal of disruptive persons who interfere with their duties.
Defense of Property Individuals may use a reasonable amount of force to protect their property. Deadly force is usually not permitted. In most states, however, deadly force might be justified if it is used to prevent or stop a felony. An owner of real property or a person, who rightfully possesses it, such as a tenant, may use force against a trespasser. Generally, a request to leave the property must be made before the application of force, unless the request would be futile. The amount of force used must be reasonable, and, unless it is necessary for self-defense, the infliction of bodily harm upon an intruder is improper.
Punishment
The law considers an assault and battery to be an invasion of the personal security of the victim for which the wrongdoer is required to pay for damages. The determination of the amount of damages to which a victim might be entitled if a defendant is found civilly liable is usually made by a jury. Generally, a plaintiff is entitled to Compensatory Damages that compensate for injuries that are both directly and indirectly related to the wrong. Examples of compensatory damages include damages for pain and suffering, damages for medical expenses, and damages for lost earnings resulting from the victim's inability to work. Some jurisdictions allow the award of Punitive Damages. They are often given when the offense was committed wantonly or maliciously to punish the defendant for the wrongful act and to deter others from engaging in similar acts in the future. The defendant might additionally be subject to criminal liability.
If a defendant is found criminally liable, the punishment is imprisonment, a fine, or both. The amount of time a defendant must serve in prison depends upon the statute in the particular jurisdiction. When the offense is committed with intent to murder or do serious harm, it is called aggravated assault and battery. An aggravated assault and battery is often committed with a dangerous weapon, and it is punishable as a felony in all states.
Disclaimer:
This article is a guideline and is not legal advice - No information here iswarrantedorguaranteedfor any purpose., as laws vary from state to state, it is not intended to be an all inclusive discussion of the law applicable to any action in your state. Please consult with a legal professional when appropriate - if you are charged with a crime, contact a criminal defense attorney.
[video=]
1 answer
Assault is a noun (an assault) and a verb (to assault).
1 answer
There are many different kinds of assault. Spitting on someone is a kind of assault. Assault certainly can be a heinous crime if it is a severe kind of assault. If it is a minor assault, then the crime is not heinous.
1 answer
There are many different kinds of assault. Spitting on someone is a kind of assault. Assault certainly can be a heinous crime if it is a severe kind of assault. If it is a minor assault, then the crime is not heinous.
1 answer
It depends on the state. Some do not allow "assault on assault" charges.
1 answer
"Deadly assault" or "assault with intent to kill".
1 answer
An assault on tradition.
Many assault attacks are described in history.
The terrorists made an assault attack on the kingdom
1 answer
Abusive language can be described as a verbal assault, but bear in mind that a verbal assault does not have the same legal significance as a physical assault.
1 answer
The "/Assault Mode" Monsters that have been released in the TCG so far are: * "Arcanite Magician/Assault Mode" * "Colossal Fighter/Assault Mode" * "Doomkaiser Dragon/Assault Mode" * "Hyper Psychic Blaster/Assault Mode" * "Red Dragon Archfiend/Assault Mode" * "Stardust Dragon/Assault Mode"
1 answer
It is better not to have any such assault on your record. Domestic assault is particularly distasteful, and is a very cowardly act.
1 answer
It may depend on the TYPE of assault being referred to. While Simple Assault is not, a Sexual Assault, or an Assault W/I to Kill (for example) certainly would be.
1 answer
An assault clip would be a container of bullets that can be snapped into an assault rifle.
1 answer