Your mode of dress is not admissible in court.

The evidence cries to be admissible, your honor!

Admissible as evidence

If something is admissible, that means it is acceptable.

AA meetings can be admissible in court. If they are court ordered or relevant to an issue or evidence, then it usually is admissible.

The ticket was not admissible because it was bought 3 hours after the movie.

Not at all. If a document is not admissible in evidence, than the question of admissibality not arise...

The evidence was not admissible in court due to it having no relevance to the proceedings.

Addible Adducible Admissible Adustible

In a court of law the only evidence that can be admissible must be gotten legally.

The word admissible has four syllables. Ad-mis-si-ble.

No

Legal requirements needed to acquire admissible statements in PA

Yes, a recorded phone call can be admissible in court as evidence, but it must meet certain legal requirements to be considered admissible, such as being relevant to the case and obtained legally.

Hearsay

no

4

Yes

Yes, faxes can be used in court. Emails, post-its, and other types of documents are admissible as well.

Yes, text messages are generally admissible as evidence in court, as long as they meet the requirements for authenticity and relevance.

Yes. If it is relevant to an issue and meets the other evidence rules, it is admissible.

Confessions made to a priest are generally considered confidential and protected by the priest-penitent privilege, which means they are not admissible in court as evidence.

Yes, video recordings can be admissible as evidence in court, as long as they meet certain criteria such as relevance, authenticity, and reliability.

yes, in certain circumstances

if you are one of the involved parties in conversation , you can record the conversation and it is admissible in court

Yes, cell phone video can be admissible as evidence in court if it meets the necessary legal requirements and is authenticated properly.

Yes, video evidence is generally admissible in court as long as it meets certain criteria, such as being relevant, authentic, and not unfairly prejudicial.

Yes, cell phone pictures can be admissible as evidence in court if they are relevant to the case and meet the necessary legal requirements for authentication.

Yes, text messages can be admissible as evidence in court proceedings, as long as they meet certain criteria such as relevance, authenticity, and reliability.

Yes.

cocaine

no

Yes. Person A is an 'eye-witness'. His testimony is admissible as evidence because he was present when person B assaulted person C.

Yes, phone recordings can be admissible as evidence in court if they meet certain criteria, such as being relevant to the case, accurately recorded, and legally obtained.

Evidence that is admissible if its is inflammatory and will have the effect of biasing jurors.

Yes, spontaneous declarations of an incriminating nature made by suspects to officers following arrest admissible at trial.

A polygraph examination is admissible in court only by the stipulation (agreement) of both parties. This is true in all U.S. courts, not just Indiana. Polygraph evidence is seldom used in court.

Yes, text messages are generally admissible as evidence in civil court proceedings, as long as they are relevant to the case and can be authenticated to prove their accuracy and origin.

Yes, circumstantial evidence is admissible in court. It can be used to support a case and help establish guilt or innocence, but it is up to the judge or jury to determine its weight and credibility in reaching a verdict.

The common law doctrine known as the "Ferreira Rule" allows for evidence from bloodhounds to be admissible in American courts. Bloodhound evidence is typically used in tracking and search operations to assist in identifying suspects or locating missing persons.

It depends on the circumstances under which it is introduced.

Addition

Commission

Magician

cost amount of something u have to pay for

hearsay

An admissible heuristic example that can guide search algorithms in finding optimal solutions is the Manhattan distance heuristic. It calculates the distance between the current state and the goal state by summing the absolute differences in their coordinates. This heuristic is admissible because it never overestimates the actual cost to reach the goal.

Yes, recorded phone calls can be admissible as evidence in court, but their admissibility may depend on various factors such as the consent of the parties involved, the relevance of the call to the case, and the legality of the recording.

Get a lawyer familiar with the firearms law of the state you are located in.

(in the US) Legally obtained confessions are ALWAYS admissable.

You can have it for up to 1 year

Evidence does not expire.

Yes, screenshots of text messages can be admissible as evidence in court, but their admissibility may depend on various factors such as authenticity and relevance. It is important to ensure that the screenshots are properly authenticated and meet the legal requirements for evidence.

No. They can be fooled which is why they are not admissible as evidence in a court of law (at least in the US)