In economics, the term underemployment has at least three different distinct
meanings and applications. All three of them involve underutilization of labor that critics say is missed by most official
(governmental agency) definitions and measurements of "unemployment."
Underemployment defined as underutilization of skills
In one usage, underemployment describes the employment of workers with high
skill levels in low-wage jobs that do not require such abilities.
For example, someone with a college degree may be tending
bar or driving a cab or being a cashier. Alternatively, a skilled machinist may be working at a fast-food outlet.
This may result from the existence of unemployment, which makes workers with bills to
pay (and responsibilities) take almost any jobs available, even if they do not use their full talents. This can also occur with
individuals who are being discriminated against, lack appropriate trade certification or academic degrees (such as a
high school or college diploma), have disabilities such as blindness or autism, or have served time in jail.
Another example of this is someone who holds high quality skills for which there is low market-place demand. While it takes great skill to acquire such academic credentials, they are valued very poorly by the marketplace, so
these people often end up taking jobs that do not utilize their full education potential.
A related kind of underemployment refers to "involuntary part-time" workers, who could (and would like to) be working for the
standard work-week (typically full-time employment means
40 hours per week in the United States) and can only work a fraction of this.
Underemploment is more prevalent during times of economic stagnation (during recessions or
depressions). Obviously, during the Great Depression of the 1930s, many of those who were not unemployed were
underemployed.
These kinds of underemployment arise because labor markets typically do not
"clear" using wage adjustment. Instead,
there is non-wage rationing of jobs.
Underemployment defined as underuse of economic capacity
Underemployment can also be used in Regional planning to describe localities where economic activity rates are unusually low. This can be
induced by a lack of job opportunities, training opportunities, or services such as
childcare and public transportation. Such
difficulties may lead residents to accept economic inactivity rather than register as
unemployed or actively seek jobs because their prospects for regular employment appear so
bleak. (These people are often called discouraged workers and are not counted
officially as being "unemployed.") The tendency to get by without work (to exit the labour
force, living off of relatives, friends, personal savings, or non-recorded economic activities) can be aggravated if it is
made difficult to obtain unemployment benefits.
Relatedly, in macroeconomics, "underemployment" simply refers to excess unemployment, i.e., high unemployment relative to full
employment or the natural rate of unemployment, also called the
NAIRU. Thus, in Keynesian economics, reference is
made to underemployment equilibrium. Economists calculate the
cyclically-adjusted full employment unemployment rate, e.g. 4% or 6% unemployment, which in a given context is regarded as "normal" and acceptable. Sometimes, this rate is
equated with the NAIRU. The difference between the observed unemployment rate and cyclically
adjusted full employment unemployment rate is one measure of the societal level of underemployment. By Okun's Law, it is correlated with the gap between potential output
and the actual real GDP. This "GDP gap" and the degree of underemployment of
labor would be larger if they incorporated the roles of underemployed labor, involuntary part-time labor, and discouraged
workers.
Underemployment defined as underuse of employed workers
The third definition of "underemployment" describes a polar opposite phenomenon: to some economists, the term refers to "overstaffing" or "hidden unemployment," the practice of businesses or entire economies employing workers who are not fully occupied
i.e. who are currently not being used to produce goods or services (in other
words, employees who are not economically productive, or underproductive, or
economically inefficient). This may be because of legal or social restrictions on
firing and lay-offs (e.g. union rules requiring managers to make a case to fire a worker or spend time and money fighting the
union) or because they are overhead workers, or because the work is highly seasonal (which is the case in accounting firms focusing on tax preparation, as well as agriculture). Note that this kind of underemployment does not refer to the kind of non-work time done
by (say) firefighters or lifeguards, who spend a lot of
their time waiting and watching for emergency or rescue work to do; this kind of activity is necessary to ensure that if (e.g.) 3
fires occur at once, there are sufficient firefighters available.
This kind of underemployed workers may exist for structural or cyclical reasons:
- For example, in Western economies, some firms become insulated from fierce
competitive pressures and grow inefficient; they may employ more workers than necessary,
and carry the resultant excess costs and depressed profits. In some
countries, labour laws or practices (e.g. powerful unions) may force employers to retain
excess labour. Other countries (e.g. Japan)
often have significant cultural influences (the relatively great importance attached to worker solidarity as opposed to shareholder rights)
that result in a reluctance to shed labour in times of difficulty. In centrally-planned
economies, lay-offs were often not allowed, so that many workers did not actually do much work on the job.
- Cyclical underemployment refers to the tendency for the capacity utilisation
rate of firms (and therefore of their demand for labor) to be lower at times of recession and/or depression. At such times, underemployment of workers may be tolerated — and indeed may be
wise business policy — given the financial cost and the degradation of morale from shedding and
then re-hiring staff. Alternatively, paying underused overhead workers is seen as an investment in their future contributions to
production. This kind of underemployment has been given as a possible reason why Airbus gained
market share from Boeing. Unlike Airbus, which had more
flexibility, Boeing was unable to ramp up production fast enough when
prosperous times returned because the company had dismissed a great part of its personnel in lean times. Another example is the
tourism sector, which is notoriously cyclical in areas where attractions are
weather-related.
See also
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)