Well i suppose they developed just plainly because everyone have a different opinion. It's just human nature and everyone had different views on how to govern the American people. Political Parties are basically just groups of people with different opinions.
Hope That Helped
Republican
Leaders
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
Regions
strongest in northern farming
areas and southern and
western back country
Beliefs
rule by the common people
weak national government
strict construction of the Constitution
protection of states' rights
laws to help farmers
low tariffs to keep goods cheap for farmers
no national bank
pro-FrenchFederalists
Leaders
Alexander Hamilton
John Adams
Regions
strongest in northern towns and coastal south
Beliefs
rule by wealthy, educated people
strong national government
loose construction of the Constitution
limits on states' rights
laws to help businesspeople
high tariffs to protect manufacturers in the United States
powerful national bank
pro-British
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson was a southern plantation owner and because of this he believed that common people, like farmers, should be able to govern them selves. Jefferson wanted more democracy in the US government then they had in the British government. He had a "strict" view of the constitution. This means that he thought we should limit the power of the central government but we should have states' rights.
Jefferson opposed a national bank. He felt congress had to much power especially if they could create a national bank. Jefferson believed that the states should create their own paper money, make loans, and keep tax funds safe (this is what the national bank would do.) Jefferson also thought that we should have low tariffs to keep goods cheap for farmers and that we should make laws to help farmers in times of trouble.
Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton was one of the youngest and smartest of the founders of the United States. Hamilton was a federalist which means that he favors a strong central government. Hamilton wanted a limited monarchy like what Great Britain had. A monarchy is like having a king or queen. If Hamilton couldn't have that then he wanted a strong aristocratic republic, with members of the government elected for life. But Alexander Hamilton did support the constitution. With the help of James Madison and John Jay, he wrote a series of essays or newspaper articles that was in favor of ratification of the constitution. These paper were later collected and put together to form what we now as "The Federalists Papers." These essays helped win New York's ratification and they influenced the rest of the country. Hamilton had a "loose" view of the constitution which means he wanted a strong central government and a limit on states' rights. Alexander Hamilton believed that we should have a national bank.
The begining of the American two party system can be traced to the battle over the raticication of the Constitution
The Populist party
The Populist party
Democratic party
the populist party
A two party system did develop in the US. The US did adopt the constitution. So the answer is yes.
The single-member district electoral system is a significant factor as to why the American two-party system persists. The two major parties are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.
The two party system began to emerge during the ratification of the constitution in 1824, shortly before the Civil War.
The two party system began to emerge during the ratification of the constitution in 1824, shortly before the Civil War.
Two Party system.
The "two party system" of "anglo+usa" tradition is in fact a one party system. Two wings of a one party system sharing the power. The to wings have agreed on an election system, which because of election mathematics will ensure the two "party" system to retain the power. Such a system is unacceptle in continental Northern Europe where a represental system and parlamentarism is generally used. These words also are used in UK+USA, but have a different meaning in continental Europe.
Yes. Only after America abandons the two party system could American systems have proper political rights in America. And with the current political system and Constitution, this will never happen.