0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is madison arguing in favor of majority rule or against it?
for majority rule
Which supreme decision said that the supreme court had the right to rule on whether laws are constitutional?
Marbury v. Madison
Is why Madison arguing against a system of majority rule?
James Madison was for Majority Rule in Federalist Number 10. He was against factions that could work against public interest.
Where should governments powers to rule come from article James Madison?
from a descent place called zootophia
What is the main goal of government according to Madison?
To collect taxes and to only allow imbeciles to rule. No smart people allow.
What was the principal effect of Marbury v. Madison (1803) on the Supreme Court?
It gave the Court the ability to rule on whether laws violate the Constitution
How did James Madison effect the great compromise?
Madison opposed the 'Great Compromise'. He felt that both houses should be elected by the people from small districts. He felt that a senate representing state interests would violate the principal of majority rule.
Why did Madison fear a majority rule?
Madison wondered whether a majority that was united by a common passion could be stopped from oppressing the minority. He felt that this could lead to an unjust pursuit of goals that would necessarily led to the suppression of the rights of others.
How did Marshall rule in marbury v. Madison?
The Supreme Court first asserted the power of judicial review by declaring an act of Congress, the Judiciary Act of 1789, unconstitutional.
How did marshall rule marbury v Madison?
The Supreme Court first asserted the power of judicial review by declaring an act of Congress, the Judiciary Act of 1789, unconstitutional.
Has power to interpret the laws?
The US Supreme CourtChief Justice John Marshall stated, in his opinion for Marbury v. Madison, (1803): "It is emphatically the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret the rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the Court must decide on the operation of each."Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
Who has power to interpret laws?
The US Supreme CourtChief Justice John Marshall stated, in his opinion for Marbury v. Madison, (1803): "It is emphatically the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret the rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the Court must decide on the operation of each."Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
